More on co-authors

As a followup to the Patterson post, here’s a post at the Christian Science Monitor about reader reactions to co-authoring. I just left a comment about the “genre books are so formulaic” bit because I’m apparently unable to let that slide, but it’s an interesting post, especially given the popularity of multi-author pseudonymous series for young readers.

Category: Books, Genre

Tagged:

2 Responses

  1. DarkHeart says:

    I think most of us agree it’s not an ideal to have a co-author and not acknowledge it, but it’s understandable in some situations. You’re right about genre fiction. A lot of terrific books come out of genres, and speculative elements have deep roots in Western literature(Greek drama, 19th century American literary romanticism, etc.). Still, I was looking at the site of a respected independent publisher that takes unsolicited submissions in romance, and they scored submissions against genre conventions. Another small publisher concerned with romance required happy endings for a book to be published.

  2. Yes, when I was teaching Women’s Popular Genres in the fall, I showed my students Harlequin’s page with descriptions of the conventions for each of their romance categories. I find romance publishing so interesting!

Leave a Reply

About Alcestis

Alcestis

Beutner renders her multilayered heroine with beauty and delicacy, and concerns herself with no less than the intricacies of the soul.

Publisher's Weekly

About me

Katharine Beutner

I write fiction and creative nonfiction. I'm a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin. My novel Alcestis, a retelling of the Greek myth, is now available from Soho Press.

  • RSS feed
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Goodreads
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Flickr